The Department of State Services (DSS) Friday failed to produce Managing Director of Capital Oil and Gas Limited, Ifeanyi Ubah, as ordered by Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High Court in Lagos.
The DSS instead filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction to entertain Ubah’s suit.
Mr Peter Oluremodu, counsel to the DSS said Ubah was not produced because there was an order to detain him for 14 days issued by a Federal Capital Territory High Court.
Justice Idris had on May 9 ordered the DSS to produce Ubah in court to show cause why he should not be released unconditionally.
But, Ubah’s lawyer, Mr Raphael Oluyede, urged Justice Idris to hold that the DSS violated his order by not producing Ubah in court today.
He said the FCT High Court’s order was obtained to frustrate Justice Idris’ order, adding that it amounted to a challenge of the court’s majesty.
“The respondents have not shown cause as why they failed to comply with your lordship’s order. Instead, they took steps to subvert the order. They acted in contempt of that order.
“The court in Abuja was not informed about the order to produce him in Lagos. Their preliminary objection is not relevant to the consideration of whether they have obeyed the order to produce him.
“I urge your lordship to consider the dignity of the court as paramount and to order Ubah’s unconditional release,” he said.
Oluyede said Ubah was first arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS) on March 27 and was released on April 13, after three weeks in detention.
He said Ubah was “coerced” to sign a document acknowledging indebtedness to the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and to pledge some of his assets.
He said the DSS also forced him to withdraw a fundamental rights suit he filed before he was released.
He said after Ubah’s release, he approached the court again to stop his re-arrest.
Oluyede said when the DSS invited Ubah, he wrote the agency about his pending suit.
The lawyer said the DSS arrested his client despite being told about the suit.
He accused the DSS of abusing its powers, and urged the court to hold that Ubah’s detention was contemptuous.
Ruling, Justice Idris, visibly disappointed with the maneuverings, held that it would be wrong for him to order for Ubah’s release since a court of coordinate jurisdiction had issued an order that he be detained for 14 days.
Justice Idris said his records show that the DSS was served with his order on May 10.
“It appears that on the same date, ie, May 10, 2017, the fourth and fifth respondents (DSS and its Director-General) obtained from an FCT High Court an order allowing them to detain the first applicant (Ubah) in their custody for an initial period of 14 days pending the completion of investigation.
“It is clear that there is a direct conflict between the order of this court and the order of my learned brother Y. Haliru J. A conflict situation has been created. It is sad and unfortunate.
“Courts of coordinate jurisdiction have been cautioned in situations like this. I will in the circumstances of this case and the pronouncements of the learned Law Lords of the Supreme Court, act ex abundanti cautela (Latin phrase for ‘out of abundant caution’).
“I will not make any order that will have the effect of neutralising the orders made by the FCT High Court. There must be discipline in the law. In insist on discipline in the law.
“In the light of the orders of the FCT High Court made on the 10th of May 2017, I will not make an order for the release of the applicant.
“Since the parties in this case have been served and the matter had been adjourned till the 18th day of May 2017, I shall adjourn till the 18th day of May 2017 when the substantive suit and all objection on jurisdiction will be taken together. This is the order of the court.”
Ubah prayed the court to compel DSS release him from its custody.
The EFCC, the DSS Director-General, NNPC and the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) are among the respondents.
The DSS arrested Ubah over alleged “economic sabotage” and “illegal sale of petroleum products stored in his tank farm by the NNPC”.
In a supporting affidavit to Ubah’s application, Capital Oil’s Secretary, George Oranuba, said the arrest was over allegations made by the NNPC and AMCON, which were already subject of a lawsuit.
Oranuba said a “throughput agreement” between Capital Oil and NNPC allows for “conversion and diversion of products by ‘operators’ so long as the operator is prepared to re-deliver the products within seven days of demand by the product’s owner or to pay a penalty for non-re-delivery”.
According to him, the failure to re-deliver was a “mere” breach of contract, which can be remedied by the payment of penalty to the owner, and was not a criminal act for which Ubah should be arrested.
“The throughput agreement expressly states that any penalty due for non-re-delivery is to be treated as a debt and I verily believe that law enforcement agencies are not allowed to operate as debt collectors,” the deponent said.
Oranuba also said NNPC was indebted to Capitol Oil in “excess of N16billion”, yet the company did not call law enforcement agencies to collect the debt.
Comments
Post a Comment